Showing posts with label Kony 2012. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kony 2012. Show all posts

Tuesday, 12 June 2012

The Grande Finale


The final lecture. What a journey it has been this semester going through the aspects of journalism for this introduction course. To mark this final lecture we had guest lecturer Steve Molk, the creator of MolksTVTalk.com.

To me, it seemed like an unprepared, prepared lecture - basically it felt so laid back that it seemed like Steve was just chatting to us, but really he imparted some good info to advise us what was happening in relation to social media and other new media methods.

So, let’s look at some of the interesting stuff he said…. Firstly his comment on Channel 7 and 9 and their reports on Kevin Rudd’s leadership challenge; one said it was just gossip, the other said it would happen. Well kudos to the latter, you got it right! Interesting though, this is a great example of the underlying biases and agendas behind the news stations. Assumingly both got the same information, and both broadcast at the same 6pm timeslot, so the denial and promotion of the challenge really just came down to the editors in the news room – agenda setting if I ever saw it!

The majority of what Steve talked about was the rising social media. You only have to look at the influence that social media had in the Libyan revolution to see the impact that it has today. And of course, what about Kony? While it lasted, social media promoted the story to millions of people who before were oblivious to the actions of Kony towards children and other Ugandans. Even though the campaign became a bit of a flop in the end, the point I’m making is that people knew about it.

Steve said you can basically write about anything when you’re online – be it crap or specialised (or perhaps even specialised crap, who knows!). Unsurprising, this media form is taking over traditional media. The downside, however, is the deterioration of facts and legitimate sources. Let’s face it, it’s a lot easier to speculate and post your ideas online than it ever was to post in a newspaper, magazine, TV or even say on the radio.

When it comes down to it, the blogs that we’re doing for assessments really aren’t that different to the blogs that people get paid for… perhaps just more freedom to write about what you want and putting in your own opinions, and not those of whom you are working for. Let’s look at the example Steve presented to us of Mia Freedman. Her blog is called Momma Mia, and this, along with another site, has 900,000 views per month. Imagine the advertising opportunities from that! Of course it didn’t just happen overnight, this took about five years to reach the audience it does, but that kind of market well exceeds that of TV influence or newspaper… plus it has a target audience, not just random distribution.

There are upsides and downsides to online news. For one, it doesn’t have a word limit, which means bloggers and other online communication outlets can be as long and in detail as need be. This also means people like me can waffle on about lecture content in great depth and bore those who are reading it (doing alright there Bruce? Not bored yet are you?). Alternatively, if you’re on Twitter you’ve got a character limit making it difficult to get your point across if you don’t put links to other pages in your tweets. What this also means though, is that you’ve got easy access to follow future employers or contacts/sources. This makes networking so much easier… even allowing the old saying of “it’s not what you know, but who you know” to be achieved so much easier.

It’s interesting to see, also, the use of Twitter from celebrities. Michael Clarke posted his wedding announcements and photos on Twitter rather than selling it to the media. Journalists no longer get exclusives and need sources “close to the family” to confirm the event. No, all you need to do is follow your celebrities and influential people and wait for them to Tweet or Facebook what you want to know (or maybe even Instagram a photo!).


All I can say now is that I’m looking forward to getting a career from journalism. Just the way Steve was talking about Tweeting people like Will Anderson and getting an hour interview as a result is incredible. He does what he loves and gets paid for - I hope I can do the same! 

Friday, 16 March 2012

Social Conscience Media 2.0

Unless you’ve been suffered the terrible and heart wrenching loss of all internet and media communication for the last few weeks, you’ve undoubtedly heard of the Kony 2012 campaign instigated by the Invisible Children group. Along I’ve seen countless Facebook, Twitter and online news articles trying to convince me to support this month’s “it” thing by signing petitions, donating to different charity groups or just sharing different YouTube or Vimeo videos.
In a matter of 12 days since it’s viral release on March 5th, the Kony 2012 video created by “Invisible Children” has received approximately 80 million hits on YouTube – not to mention the millions of other views on associated videos. Clearly this mass marketing at its finest; you couldn’t ask for a better target audience.

While I would love to throw out my many opinions on this Kony campaign issue (and trust me there are many) I would instead like to link this issue to my assessment and JOUR1111 course content; albeit slightly late! In our second lecture we discussed the changing use of web in society, from the traditional 1.0 information web, to the 2.0 new media “social” web and coming into the 3.0 semantic web.

Obviously there is no better current example than Kony 2012 to highlight the extent of connectedness in the 2.0 social web. Think about it, Kony and his guerrilla group “The Lord’s Resistance Army” (LRA) have been abducting children as sex-slaves and warriors since 1986, but most people until last week hadn’t even heard of him. Even in 2005 Kony’s actions should have become world news when he was indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court (ICC) – but sadly it wasn’t until September 2006 that Facebook was open to anyone who wanted an account, and it wasn’t until August 2008 that Facebook had the capacity to branch out to its first 100 million users.  


Don’t get me wrong, I think it’s great that there is now mass awareness of the atrocities that have been committed in Uganda and, from extrapolation, the numerous other crimes against humanity in the surrounding African nations. It’s just sad to think that if we had had this connectedness beforehand, and hence the pressure on governments to intervene in these states, that the lives of so many people could have been saved or free from torment.

Though this raises another question from our lecture, would we be willing to pay for this information? While for the most part we were discussing high-end newspapers restricting access to their online content to paying customers only, would we be so socially aware if we had to pay for out 2.0 media devices?

I know I would certainly reconsider my Facebook and Twitter accounts if faced with the idea of having to pay for it. As such, I would miss out on all the latest social-media trends and undoubtedly be on the back foot with knowing what the latest “it” topic is – well at least until the old media caught up with the hype. Thankfully though, for the time being, Facebook’s 845+ million active users can enjoy their free access to the social media news.
At least that’s one good thing that’s come out of our entitlement to free social media, the governments are forced to listen to the masses – just like my tutor is forced to read this terrible blog!